Work & Field Notes

Systems I've built.

A look at the AI-native go-to-market systems I've designed and shipped โ€” the gap each one closed, how it was built, and what changed. Written the way I'd explain it to a colleague: what worked, and what I'd do differently.

๐Ÿ“ Draft scaffold. Three case-study slots below, pre-filled with pattern-level examples and kept generic (no proprietary detail). Replace the bracketed prompts with your real specifics โ€” or just tell me the details and I'll write them in. The "What changed" boxes are where rough numbers go (program reach, time saved, signal quality, adoption).
01

Automated account prioritisation

The gap

Sellers were prioritising accounts by gut and stale lists. Useful signals existed but were scattered across tools, and ranking them by hand didn't scale across APAC markets.

What I built

An AI-assisted workflow that pulls signals from across the stack, scores and ranks accounts by likelihood and timing, and hands sellers a prioritised, refreshed shortlist โ€” no manual list-building.

Stack
ClaudeGumloopAgent workflow[+ data sources]
What changed
[Add outcome โ€” e.g. hours/week saved, % of pipeline from prioritised accounts, adoption by sellers, lift in conversion.]
What I'd do differently

[One honest reflection โ€” what you'd change, where the model needed a human, what you learned. This line is what makes it credible.]

02

Buying-signal intelligence system

The gap

Buying intent was showing up in fragments โ€” across product usage, engagement, and external signals โ€” but no one had a single, trusted view, so moments of intent were being missed.

What I built

A system that consolidates and interprets signals, surfaces the ones that actually indicate intent, and routes them to the right person at the right moment instead of leaving insights trapped across tools.

Stack
ClaudeCursorAgent workflow[+ data sources]
What changed
[Add outcome โ€” e.g. signals surfaced per week, faster follow-up, meetings/pipeline influenced, fewer missed moments.]
What I'd do differently

[One honest reflection โ€” e.g. signal noise vs. precision, where trust had to be earned before sellers acted on it.]

03

Personalised enterprise outreach at scale

The gap

Personalised enterprise outreach was either genuinely personal (and slow) or scalable (and generic). There was no way to do both across multiple APAC markets without a big team.

What I built

An AI-assisted outreach workflow that grounds each message in real account context, so enterprise outreach stays personal and relevant while running at a scale a manual process couldn't reach.

Stack
ClaudeGumloopAgent workflow[+ outreach tools]
What changed
[Add outcome โ€” e.g. reply rate vs. baseline, volume handled without added headcount, pipeline influenced.]
What I'd do differently

[One honest reflection โ€” e.g. where automation helped vs. where the human voice still mattered, guardrails for quality/trust.]

Current stack

The tools I reach for to build go-to-market systems independently โ€” no engineering dependency.

ClaudeCursorGumloopAgent workflows [CRM / data tools][outreach / enablement tools][+ add any others]

Want the detail behind any of these?

Happy to walk through how they were built.